Science vs. Art

Can science ever critique art in a meaningful way?

Why not?

The deeper you fall into the world of science, the more you realize the necessity of a philosophical point of view.

The field of science is ever-expanding because of the need human beings have of finding answers to any proposed questions. So you can say, with full certainty, that one must have a good imagination to thrive in the sciences. How else are you going to prove theorems, study the universe, or the beings that take part in it?

One can view art as an expression of feeling or a particular thought, and that is part of human behavior, which is studied and therefore analyzed. What then, can stop science from making significant statements on art?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: